Arbitration Law

Arbitration is often touted as a faster, more flexible alternative to traditional litigation. In India, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 governs the arbitration process, providing a structured and balanced framework for resolving disputes.  However, like any system, arbitration can face challenges along the way. One such challenge is the “Failure or Impossibility of Arbitrator […]

Arbitration is often hailed as a faster, more efficient way to resolve disputes compared to traditional court proceedings. However, just like any other legal process, it’s not without its checks and balances. One of the key safeguards built into the system of arbitration in India is the Procedure for Removal of Arbitrator under Section 13

Arbitration, an alternative dispute resolution mechanism, is often hailed for its efficiency and flexibility. However, even in this supposedly streamlined process, disputes can arise over the impartiality or independence of arbitrators. Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, lays down the “grounds for challenge” to question an arbitrator’s appointment or continuation.  But what

Disputes are inevitable in commercial relationships. Arbitration is often the preferred method to resolve them efficiently and privately. But what happens when the process of appointing an arbitrator stalls? That’s where the court steps in, exercising its default power to make the appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Arbitration has become one of the most popular methods for resolving disputes, especially in commercial, civil, and international matters. In India, the legal framework for arbitration is governed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. At the heart of this process is the arbitration tribunal, which plays a pivotal role in ensuring that disputes are

Legal disputes can often be long and drawn-out, but what happens when an urgent action is required before a final judgment is rendered? Well, this is where interim measures by the court come into play! Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, these temporary orders serve as a lifeline, preventing further harm

Arbitration, as a method of dispute resolution, has gained immense popularity over the years due to its efficiency and flexibility. Among its many facets, one of the most critical concepts is the “Reference to Arbitration”. So, what does this term really mean? In essence, it refers to the process of referring a dispute to an

Arbitration is hailed as a go-to method for resolving disputes quickly and efficiently. But what happens when an arbitrator bows out—either by choice, legal necessity, or unforeseen circumstances? That’s where the Appointment of Substitute Arbitrator under Section 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, swoops in to save the day.  This seemingly simple concept

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, serves as the cornerstone of alternative dispute resolution in India, providing mechanisms such as arbitration, conciliation, and mediation. Among its vital provisions, Section 6 stands out for addressing administrative assistance, a crucial element in ensuring the efficiency and smooth operation of arbitration proceedings.  This section empowers parties and arbitral