Justice-Oriented Approach to Delay Condonation Plea SUPREME COURT

Justice Oriented Approach To Be Adopted While Dealing With Delay Condonation Plea: Supreme Court

Regarding delay condonation applications, the Supreme Court remarked that courts should adopt a justice-oriented approach instead of a “rigid technical approach.”

The trial court decided the case on October 1, 2005. The defendants filed their initial appeal along with a request to waive a 52-day delay. The lower appellate court dismissed the appeal based on the statute of limitations on October 8, 2010, finding that the delay was not adequately explained. On April 16, 2015, the High Court dismissed the second appeal because there was no legal issue to consider.

The bench of the Supreme Court noted that the appellants were only 52 days late in submitting their appeal and needed to be made aware of the ruling.

The bench, referring to Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag & Anr. vs Mst. Katiji & Ors.

The above decision expressing the intention of justice oriented approach percolating down to all the courts was rendered nearly three decades ago but unfortunately the case on hand demonstrates the pervading insensitive approach, which apart from continuing the agony of the litigants concerned has also unnecessarily burdened the judicial hierarchy which after going through the entire process will have to set the clock back, at this distant point in time and prolong their agony. If only the court concerned had been sensitive to the justice oriented approach rather than the iron- cast technical approach, the litigation between the parties probably would have come to an end much earlier after decision on the merits of their rival contention.”

The court noted that the lower Appellate Court had dismissed the appeal based on delay, even though the delay was not excessive. Holding that it was unjustified, the bench returned the request to the subordinate Appellate Court’s file.


Raheem Shah vs Govind Singh | (SC) 572 | 2023 INSC 651


Limitation Act, 1962; Section 5 – Justice oriented approach rather than the iron-cast technical approach to be adopted – Supreme Court restored an appeal before the lower appellate court, which had dismissed it on the ground that the delay of 52 days was not adequately explained – Referred to Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag & Anr. Vs. Mst. Katiji & Ors. (1987) 2 SCC 107. (Para 3-6)



Rakesh Sharma

Mr. Rakesh Sharma, advocate is the most experienced member of our team and when it comes t...

The Law Codes

Siddharth Sharma

Siddharth Sharma is one of our leading and versatile lawyers who believe in dynamic lawyer...

The Law Codes

Rohit Samhotra

Dr. Samhotra is a dental graduate, and he continued the dental practice for a few years af...

The Law Codes

Sunny Menghi

Sunny Menghi embarked on his academic journey in Law at Panjab University, earning his bac...

The Law Codes

Ameesha Goel

Ameesha is among our young talents and a graduate of IP University, Delhi. She has a zeal ...

The Law Codes

V. Chaitanya Rao

V. Chaitanya Rao is one of the newer members of The Law Codes team. He brings an air of yo...

The Law Codes
error: Content is protected !!